Church of the Open Door:  First Christian Church, Ukiah
like us on facebook!
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • News
  • Out Reach
  • Pastor's Blog
  • Church History

A LETTER (MAYBE) FROM SOMEONE TO SOMEONE

7/29/2018

0 Comments

 
Hebrews 13:1-8

Let mutual love continue.  Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for by doing that some have entertained angels without knowing it.  Remember those who are in prison, as though you were in prison with them; those who are being tortured, as though you yourselves were being tortured.  Let marriage be held in honor by all, and let the marriage bed be kept undefiled.  Keep your lives free from the love of money, and be content with what you have; for he has said, “I will never leave you or forsake you.”  So we can say with confidence,
​

     “The Lord is my helper;  I will not be afraid. What can anyone do to me?”

Remember your leaders, those who spoke the word of God to you; consider the outcome of their way of life, and imitate their faith.  Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.

​
The second in our “the rest of them” series of letters – those not by Paul or even one of the fake-Paul’s – is the Letter to the Hebrews – one of the most mis-named epistles in scripture.

That title, “Letter to the Hebrews” was given to it sometime in the second century – nowhere does the letter writer, or apparently anyone in the first century, make any such claim.  “Hebrews” in biblical context is usually a synonym for “Jews” – yet it is clearly written to Christians. 

Being addressed to a large category of people – such as the Hebrews – makes it sound like it is written as a general, circulating letter – yet the content makes it pretty clear it is addressed to one, specific congregation, rather than Hebrews or Christians in general.

On top of all this, we have no real idea who wrote it.  Years later, somewhere in the 200’s an early theologian named Origen declared that the author was “known only to God,” and the Christian world has pretty much gone with that ever since.  Some people like to think it may have been written by Paul, but there is no truly persuasive reason to believe this and most bible scholars today do not, for a number of reasons.

Why does all this matter?  In case you’ve forgotten, I’ll remind you.  Any time we read scripture, context matters!  Who wrote it?  When was it written?  What was the political/cultural context of the society in which it was written?  Was it written by someone in power or someone at the bottom of the heap?  How about the people to whom it was written?  Were they free? safe? well-off or poor?  Were they eye-witnesses to what they are reporting or simply passing on what others have told them?  When we are reading the documents that we accept as the source of our faith, these questions actually do matter.

Hebrews is a substantive book, making some large claims that have become important pieces of our belief system.  If we call ourselves Christians, then, whether we are conscious of it or not, we have been shaped by this so-called Letter to the Hebrews.

It all boils down to this question:  do we accept everything we read in scripture because somewhere we were taught to accept it unquestioningly?  Just because?  Or do we read it because we ourselves find “truth” in the things we hear?  A truth that matches our lived experience of a Divinity that loves us and walks with us through this existence?
Because of the time-gap between then and now and the often chaotic state of the world in the intervening centuries we usually don’t have a whole lot of reliable evidence available to us.  But it is important that we put in the time to do our best with the clues we do have.  Because I am not myself a biblical scholar, I find those people I do trust who do know these things.

In the case of the writer of Hebrews, we do know that he/she was educated.  His Greek (we’ll go with he for convenience) and his syntax are very sophisticated.  He also knew the Old Testament – the Hebrew Scriptures – extremely well.  He quotes the Old Testament very often, using these quotes to connect Jesus to Hebrew history all the way back to Creation.

As we will see, his use of “Son of God” and “our great High Priest”  language is similar to that used both in Colossians and in John’s Gospel and shows the unknown author as tending toward a “cosmic Christ” vision of Jesus.  We’ll get into that more later.

As to when it was written, that’s pretty much up for grabs, as well.  It could be anywhere from 35 to 70 years after the death of Jesus. As we will see there is a lot of discussion of the temple and temple sacrifice here, but no reference at all to the destruction of the temple in 70 A.D., forty years after the crucifixion, suggesting to some that it was written prior to that date.

Others believe the letter is the work of 2nd generation Christians who have experienced persecution.  They suggest the destruction of the temple isn’t mentioned because it was such common knowledge that everyone would have known about it anyway.  Marc Borg places its writing around the year 90 – and for lack of better info, we’ll go with that.

Next week we will look at the particulars of what Hebrews actually says.  It’s a longer letter than others we’ve read recently – thirteen chapters – with some fairly complicated theological issues.  We’ll need some time to give it a fair reading – so we’ll come back to it next week.  The things we'll find in this book are worth our educated understanding, rather than just our unthinking acceptance. It will be interesting to see what we recognize in it as pieces of what we ourselves have always assumed about being a Christian.
0 Comments

DOERS WHO DO:  JAMES, pt. 2

7/22/2018

0 Comments

 
James 2:14-18   (The Message)

Dear friends, do you think you’ll get anywhere in this if you learn all the right words but never do anything?  Does merely talking about faith indicate that a person really has it?  For instance, you come upon an old friend dressed in rags and half-starved and say, “Good morning, friend!  Be clothed in Christ!  Be filled with the Holy Spirit!” and walk off without providing so much as a coat or a cup of soup—where does that get you?  Isn’t it obvious that God-talk without God-acts is outrageous nonsense?

I can already hear one of you agreeing by saying, “Sounds good.  You take care of the faith department, I’ll handle the works department.”

Not so fast.  You can no more show me your works apart from your faith than I can show you my faith apart from my works.  Faith and works, works and faith, fit together hand in glove.

Last week we pretty much covered all the “nerdy” stuff from James – the who, what, when and why of the writer’s intention – at least, most of it.  This week we’ll be looking at two specific teachings.  Remember, this is a letter (or perhaps a sermon), not an historical narrative.  It is short, but it packs a lot of depth into its brief writing.  As I mentioned last week, this is not a theological document, it is a primer on living wisely.

Though James addresses this missive to “the twelve tribes in the Diaspora,” it wasn’t written just to Jews in general, but specifically to Christian Jews – those who had become followers of Jesus.  This is an important point for us to understand, because James writes a lot about wisdom here, but because his audience is Jewish Christians, their understanding of wisdom is going to be a distinctly Jewish understanding. 

The definition I was taught is that “knowledge is knowing something, but wisdom is knowing what to do with what you know.”  Old Testament writing adds an additional layer to our understanding of that word, wisdom, in that it connects it to the Holy Spirit – the Spirit breathes wisdom into to world – and the language of the Wisdom writings often conflate these two – Wisdom and Spirit as two ways of speaking about the same thing..  Wisdom, then, is more than knowledge – it is knowledge given directly from God.

This wisdom is not esoteric or difficult to access – the Spirit speaks to all of us who will listen.  And wisdom is easy to recognize in others:  Who is wise and understanding among you? Show by your good life that your works are done with gentleness born of wisdom [writes James].....the wisdom from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, willing to yield, full of mercy and good fruits, without a trace of partiality or hypocrisy.  And a harvest of righteousness is sown in peace for those who make peace. (James 3:13, 17-18)

The least well known part of James’ letter are a handful of verses condemning wealth in no uncertain terms:  Come now, you rich people, weep and wail for the miseries that are coming to you.  Your riches have rotted, and your clothes are moth-eaten.  Your gold and silver have rusted, and their rust will be evidence against you, and it will eat your flesh like fire. (5:1-3a).  Language this harsh, this blunt is applied nowhere else in James except when he is discussing the rich.

What is most interesting is that these anti-wealth passages do not appear anywhere in the lectionary, either Protestant or Catholic, so you were unlikely to ever really know these verses exist unless you are a dedicated bible scholar.  Think about why that might be.

The single best known part of the Letter of James is that part we heard read at the beginning -- the writer’s famous assertion that “faith without works is dead.”  This is the passage that Martin Luther objected to so strenuously that he wanted the entire letter stripped out of the bible.  The letter has been called “scandalous” because of this passage. 

Paul wrote that “we are justified by grace through faith.”  Luther followed this entirely and therefore entirely rejected James’ famous, though supposedly scandalous, take on faith and works.  And because of this, wanted the entire book tossed out, regardless of how much good, solid teaching there is here.

Full disclosure time:  I don’t like Martin Luther.  I have always found him to be loud and arrogant.  Probably heresy for a Protestant, but there it is – I think he’s wrong on many points.  Much of what he had to say needed to be said.  The errors and excesses of the Catholic Church needed to be reined in – absolutely – but Luther’s arrogant stance that he was right and anyone who disagreed with him was wrong, just turns me off entirely.

I have always sided with James on this one.  Paul and Luther want it to be all grace through faith – sola gratia -- and yet, if grace requires our faith before it is efficacious, does not our having to have faith become a “work” in and of itself?  James insists we cannot just sit back and say, “I believe that,” and then do nothing with that belief.  Any faith that says, “I believe,” and then sits back and does nothing is not true faith in my book.  As we heard in our opening reading:  You can no more show me your works apart from your faith than I can show you my faith apart from my works. Faith and works, works and faith, fit together hand in glove.

Jesus explicitly tells us to do:  to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to care for each other -- and he is equally explicit on how he feels about us when we don't do these things.  If I say, I believe in this,  and then do nothing but praise Jesus for my faith, how can I say I am following Jesus?

There is so much in this very short letter, I really recommend you take the time to read it through for yourselves and form your own conclusions.  We’ll end today with this brief passage from the first chapter:
  • Be doers of the word, and not merely hearers who deceive themselves.  For if any are hearers of the word and not doers, they are like those who look at themselves in a mirror -- they look at themselves and, on going away, immediately forget what they were like.  But those who look into the perfect law, the law of liberty, and persevere, being not hearers who forget but doers who act—they will be blessed in their doing.   (1:22-25)
0 Comments

THE REST OF THEM: JAMES

7/15/2018

0 Comments

 
James 3:13-18
     Do you want to be counted wise, to build a reputation for wisdom? Here’s what you do: Live well, live wisely, live humbly. It’s the way you live, not the way you talk, that counts. Mean-spirited ambition isn’t wisdom. Boasting that you are wise isn’t wisdom. Twisting the truth to make yourselves sound wise isn’t wisdom. It’s the furthest thing from wisdom—it’s animal cunning, devilish conniving. Whenever you’re trying to look better than others or get the better of others, things fall apart and everyone ends up at the others’ throats.
     Real wisdom, God’s wisdom, begins with a holy life and is characterized by getting along with others. It is gentle and reasonable, overflowing with mercy and blessings, not hot one day and cold the next, not two-faced. You can develop a healthy, robust community that lives right with God and enjoy its results only if you do the hard work of getting along with each other, treating each other with dignity and honor.

​
Today we begin the fourth leg of our long journey through the New Testament.  To remind you of the plan, and recap what we have already done, we started two summers ago by taking an in-depth look into the four Gospels. The next summer we did the same with seven letters attributed to Paul – the seven that are considered by most mainline scholars as genuinely Pauline.

Then this summer, so far, we have read through the six remaining “letters from Paul” – the ones attributed to him but most likely not actually written by him, but by others using his name and his market value.

Just as a reminder, we have done all this because we believe that if we are going to claim to be Christians and look to the Bible for our history we need to know more about said Bible.  Not just what it says, but why it says it.  Out of the dozens of documents left to us from the biblical time-frame, why were these few preserved and gathered together into this collection?  Who wrote them?  Why were they written and to whom?  And why do we care?

Last week we read from Rachel Held Evans’ new book, “Inspired,” and learned about “origin stories,” those “family-gathered-around-the-kitchen-table” stories we tell about those who came before us and how they shaped who we are today.  Scripture is similarly a collection of stories written by and about people - real live ordinary people -- people with worries and fears and hopes and dreams.  People who were leaders and people who were followers.  People mostly doing their best.  We have claimed their  stories as somehow part of our own history, therefore we have an obligation to know more about them and what they mean to us here today – two thousand years later.

So today we’ll start the fourth section of documents, the ones I’ll just refer to as “the rest of them.”  This will include the remaining New Testament letters – ones attributed not to Paul, but to other writers - James, Jude, three letters from John, two from Peter, plus the unattributed Letter to the Hebrews.  Just who these letters were actually written by is a question we will handle as we get to each one.

So first, the letter from James.  The author identifies himself only as “James” and  doesn’t clarify which James.  Historically the church assumed it was James, the brother of Jesus.  This James was, according to both Paul and Peter, the leader of the early Christian community in Jerusalem.  He was executed in the early 60’s.

If we accept this attribution then this letter could have been written as early as twenty years after Jesus’ crucifixion – which would make it even earlier than Paul’s authentic letters – the earliest written pieces we have.

But the majority of mainstream scholars do not believe this is a true attribution – in part because the writer never mentions a relationship with Jesus or with the church in Jerusalem.  Even more important here is the fact that the document is written in Greek – and pretty sophisticated Greek, at that, and while not impossible, it does seem unlikely, at best, that a brother to Jesus, raised, as Jesus was, in rural Galilee and speaking only Aramaic, would suddenly have such an educated grasp of Greek.

If we don’t accept this James as the brother of Jesus then we don’t know who he was and the date of writing could be just about anywhere from the 70’s to 100's.  Marc Borg puts it somewhere in the 70’s – after Mark's gospel and before Matthew’s.

After Paul’s letters, these two gospels are the earliest remaining writings we have.  The writer of James never quotes either gospel directly but he does seem to share ideas with them, suggesting they all pulled from the same source materials. 

Remember “Q,” that designation bible scholars use for a non-surviving written source from the earliest years of Christianity?  Several early documents appear to quote from the same document, but that document doesn’t exist anymore, its existence is only implied by the similar quotes.  Anyway, these similarities all help us date James somewhere near Mark and Matthew, so we’re back there among the earliest documents, after Paul’s letters.

James is a very different example of writing from anything we have looked into so far in this study.  We call it a letter, yet there is no greeting and no closing.  It isn’t addressed to any of the early Christian communities.  There is no mention of specific towns or people as Paul’s letters usually have.

It is not particularly theological writing – there’s nothing about the life and death of Jesus, there’s nothing about doctrine, nothing about what we must believe – it just seems to be practical wisdom – but the practical wisdom is pretty amazing stuff.  The writer quotes more sayings from Jesus than any New Testament document other than the gospels – and manages not to theologize about them.

I’m going to stop here for today.  I’ve given you all the boring, nerdy stuff, now.   Next week we will hear what this James-person has to say – and it’s not boring.  We’ll also see how history has viewed it down through the centuries - which is definitely not boring.

0 Comments

WHY DOES THE BIBLE MATTER? ... OR DOES IT?

7/8/2018

0 Comments

 
This week we took a break from our study of the formation of Christianity as it it portrayed in the Bible -- and just read a story.

The story is from the new book by Rachel Held Evans, titled Inspired, and is her personal story about believing in scripture, then not believing, and then believing again.  There was no sermon, no scholarly notes from the pastor, just a part of the author's story as she tells it in this book.  

I am a compulsive reader - have been all my life.  I love learning and love hearing other people's takes on almost anything.  As a pastor, I often run into something I want to quote in my sermons -- no problem - except when I want to quote too much, simply because the author says it so darn well.  This was one of those times. The author doesn't present anything here that is earth-shatteringly new -- she offers nothing newsworthy to the biblical scholar.  She just tells her story in such a way that it is well worth reading - accessible and interesting to the layperson.

The author's chapter on "Origins" is written so simply, so openly, that I just decided the congregation needed to hear it.  So I gave myself a Sunday off from writing and read them a story - Rachel Held Evan's "kitchen table" story of our ancestors and the origins of our relationship with God.

I'm not going to quote it all here - there are such things as copyright laws - but I heartily recommend the book to any and all.

  • Inspired:  Slaying Giants, Walking on Water, and Loving the Bible Again,  (c) 2018 by Rachel Held Evans
0 Comments

THE AUTHORITARIAN CHURCH

7/1/2018

0 Comments

 
Titus 1:1-16  (The Message)

There are a lot of rebels out there, full of loose, confusing, and deceiving talk. Those who were brought up religious and ought to know better are the worst.  They’ve got to be shut up.  They’re disrupting entire families with their teaching, and all for the sake of a fast buck.  One of their own prophets said it best:

          “The Cretans are liars from the womb, barking dogs, lazy bellies.”

He certainly spoke the truth. Get on them right away.  Stop that diseased talk of Jewish make-believe and made-up rules so they can recover a robust faith. Everything is clean to the clean-minded; nothing is clean to dirty-minded unbelievers.  They leave their dirty fingerprints on every thought and act.  They say they know God, but their actions speak louder than their words.  They’re real creeps, disobedient good-for-nothings.
​

Today, with a quick look through Titus (because Titus is a very quick book) we’re going to finish up with the original plan we had for this summer sermon series – to read through the attributed-to-Paul-but-most-likely-not-by-him letters of the New Testament – Colossians, Ephesians, 2nd Thessalonians, 1st and 2nd Timothy – and now Titus.  I don’t think we entirely realized before when we started just how similar they all are and how repetitive, without adding a whole lot that’s new.

First and Second Timothy and Titus are assumed to have all three been written by the same writer.  They are collectively referred to as “the pastoral letters” -- in part, because they are addressed to Timothy and Titus, who were in pastoral roles.  “Pastor” wasn’t yet an official institutional role and was still used more in its ancient meaning as “shepherd,” or the “leader of the flock.”  Since these two men traveled on directions from Paul, think, maybe we should look at it in terms of a diocesan level ministry rather than a single parish level, if that makes any sense to you.  More like La Taunya Bynum than me. The letters are also pastoral because their subject matter deals with specific instructions on how to lead the flocks.

Since we know these letters were written 50 years after the fact, it is entirely possible that not only was the real Paul long gone, (which he was), but that the Timothy and Titus who originally traveled with him, and to whom these letters are supposedly addressed, were deceased by now, as well.  In this case, not only is the writer false but also the ones to whom the letters are directed.  It is likely that the congregations receiving these letters, however, were real – real people, in real time, facing real issues --- just not issues the living Paul would have dealt with.

Like the Timothy letters, the language used in Titus doesn’t sound like Paul – not his rhetorical style, not his attitudes towards people, not his subject matter.  And just as 2nd Timothy appears to double-down on the “you must” language from 1st Timothy, so Titus seems to go further yet in its insistence on following proper doctrinally approved positions.  Men must be upright (as “upright” is defined by the writer), women must be invisible, slaves must be subservient at all times.   No discussion, no differing opinions.
But more frightening even than all the social control, following the proper rules has now almost completely overtaken listening for the voice of the Spirit within you to understand God’s will for you.  Now there are authoritative “rules” and “sound doctrine” telling you what to believe.

Perhaps the most disturbing part of this letter is not the escalating language against woman, slaves, and outsiders, but the almost hysterical tone in the writer’s voice as he condemns any and all who act outside the officially approved doctrine.  From our reading this morning:  There are a lot of rebels out there, full of loose, confusing, and deceiving talk. Those who were brought up religious and ought to know better are the worst.  They’ve got to be shut up.  That’s from The Message. 

The NRSV makes it even stronger:  There are many rebellious people, idle talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision; they must be silenced. 

“They’ve got to be shut up”.....”they must be silenced.”  This is not the language of Paul, and it is certainly not the language of Jesus.  This is the language of authoritarianism.  And it sounds distressingly familiar to present day ears.

“Lock ‘em up!  Shut ‘em down!  Toss ‘em out!”  Today we expect to hear this language from a Trump rally, but this is the institutional church that was being built back in 110 AD.  I am, frankly, not a big fan of that church.

There are five points that are traditional Disciples of Christ affirmations. These points are a large part of why I am here today.  Probably it’s the same for you:


  1. All people are God’s children.  All - just ALL.
  2. Open Communion. The Lord’s Supper is celebrated weekly and is open to all.  Again, All means all.
  3. The Ministry of all Believers: Both ordained ministers and lay persons are responsible for leading worship and nurturing spiritual growth.  How and where, and why we choose to worship is our responsibility.
  4. Diversity of Opinion: Each person is free to determine their own belief guided by the Holy Spirit, the Bible, study and prayer.  No one is anointed by God to make these choices for us.
  5. Faith in Service: We believe God’s gifts are never given just for us, but for service in raising up the reign of God among all peoples.  This is what we do - not just for ourselves but for all God's beloveds.

Each of these points is important to me, but it is #4 which speaks the most clearly to today's message.  As followers of Jesus (Remember him?  He's the one the real Paul preached about,) we are not only allowed but expected to study and pray and think for ourselves. We are expected to welcome and pay heed to the voice of the Spirit speaking within each one of us -- not to blindly submit to authorities who wish to tell us what they have decided we must believe.

This is who we are.  I suspect we might well drive the author of these “pastoral” letters crazy.

I most certainly hope so.
​

0 Comments
    Picture

    Rev. Cherie Marckx

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013

    RSS Feed