Church of the Open Door:  First Christian Church, Ukiah
like us on facebook!
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • News
  • Out Reach
  • Pastor's Blog
  • Church History

THE LANGUAGE OF JOHN'S GOSPEL - part 2

7/21/2024

0 Comments

 
John 6:35-38
Jesus declared, “I am the bread of life.  Whoever comes to me will never go hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty.  But as I told you, you have seen me and still you do not believe.  All those the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never drive away.  For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me. 
​


Last week
we began our journey into the fourth gospel.  In truth we don’t actually know who wrote any of the gospels, but for convenience sake we use the traditional names ascribed to them—for this gospel that name is John—John the Apostle, John son of Zebedee (even though modern scholars find this a highly unlikely identification since this gospel was written in good Greek and employs a sophisticated theology unlikely to have been known to a simple Galilean fisherman.)

We began last week by discussing some of the surface differences that set John’s gospel apart from the synoptics, Matthew, Mark, and Luke.  I said at that time that we’d be covering more of the differences as we go along.  We will eventually get to the “stories” of Jesus, but before we can do that we must deal with the main issue of the things that set John’s gospel so far apart from the others, because those differences are not simply matters of style, but of substance.  They are the reason this gospel exists.

This account comes, not just from one man, but from a community, and it is based in the belief that comes from this community.  But that communal account appears to have been strictly edited by one man with an agenda – condensing and distilling from that communal account to reveal that absolute truth of who, what, and why Jesus existed among us.

The writer here isn’t setting out to write fiction or history, his narrative is as historically based as any other gospel, but his goal is persuasion, not a history of a certain time and place.  This is why we can’t read this gospel as historical narrative as we do the synoptics.  John doesn’t care about when things happened or why or in what order.  Those things are irrelevant to him.   All John cares about is that we learn his truth of Jesus through each event.

John’s gospel was never meant to be a general history lesson, it is testimony—a testimony as to what Jesus had become – how he was now seen in the early-Christian communities such as John’s around the year AD 90, sixty years after Jesus’ death and resurrection, when this gospel was most likely written.   John wrote this testimony in a particularly rich and expressive language which touched people then and has touched us and shaped our Christian belief ever since.

The language of this gospel is full of symbolic words and idioms which describe Jesus in phrases that touch our hearts and spirits and not just our brains:  “I am the bread of life” is not a logical sentence.  How can we describe a person as a piece of bread? – but still we know what the writer means.  These words touch something deep inside us that show us who Jesus is.  We may not completely understand it in rational thought – but we know instinctively what it means. Other phrases, such as “Here is the Lamb of God” or “I am the Light of the World,” these are not everyday descriptive words, they are symbols that reach us on a  deep level.

As we read John we’ll find that he uses other phrases that also speak in a similar symbolic language—phrases such as “on the third day” which are used throughout scripture, not just in John.  “One the third day” is not simply a chronological marker – it is a phrase that signifies something important is happening.  Truly significant things always happen on the third day.

Another such “pay attention” phrase is anything using “wedding” or “marriage.”  Yes, these may sometimes simply be referring to an actual marriage, but all the way through the bible God’s relationship with God’s people is often likened to marriage vows and the mutual care that goes with them.

As I’ve said before, John’s is an especially “wordy” gospel, and we will hopefully be noticing, as we read, that many of John’s words have symbolic meanings.  Let’s agree now that as we study here we will pay attention to what we’re hearing so that we get not only the surface meanings, but also the deeper understandings that this writer intends so that we can know, not only the Jesus we’ve always known from the synoptics but also this infinitely great Jesus that John and his community of believers came to know and love.
​

0 Comments

THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO JOHN:  Introduction to Series

7/14/2024

0 Comments

 

John 1:24-27, 29-34
The Pharisees sent to John the Baptist and asked him, “Why are you baptizing if you are neither the Messiah, nor Elijah, nor the prophet?”  And John answered, “I baptize with water.  Among you stands one whom you do not know, the one who is coming after me; I am not worthy to untie the strap of his sandal.”  
The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and declared, “Here is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world! ….. And he testified, “I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it remained on him.  I myself did not know him, but the one who sent me to baptize with water said to me, ‘He on whom you see the Spirit descend and remain is the one who baptizes with the Holy Spirit.’  And I myself have seen and have testified that this is the Chosen One.”

Following a few weeks spent moving somewhat randomly around in the New Testament, primarily within the four Gospels, in search of understanding as to why we read the scriptures as we do, how we read them through the veil of 2000 years of cultural change, and what we learn from them, our in-person group has decided we want to spend some time focused on the fourth gospel – the one attributed to John the Apostle (or John the Evangelist) as he is also known.

I’ll be digging into the thoughts of two respected and well-known bible scholars, Gerard Sloyan and Marcus Borg, to gain insight into what this gospel account offers us.  Sloyan, a Catholic priest, will offer us a more traditional interpretation, while Borg, a former fellow of the Jesus Seminar, will generally bring us a more progressive. View.  Between the two, I think we can learn quite a lot.

We get brief glimpses into John throughout the liturgical year, but they are few and randomly scattered compared to the dedicated year-long study the other three gospels each receive in their lectionary settings.  Some of what we end up discussing here will sound familiar because we have come across it in recent “fill-in” days when John readings were inserted into the lectionary schedule. Hopefully, when we finish this series, we’ll understand more how all these bits and pieces fit together to form a powerful and affective gospel.

John’s gospel has caused division from its earliest days primarily because it IS different.  While there are many similarities between this gospel and the three synoptics, it is the differences that get the most attention. Sloyan shows us just how it has befuddled and annoyed scholars in this long quote from his volume of the Interpretation commentary series:
  • The Fourth Gospel continues to baffle, to enrich, to infuriate, and to console as it has done for centuries. It is worthless as history, say some. It is more dependable as a source on Palestinian life than the Synoptics, say others. It had to have been written after the last of the Synoptics, the majority holds. It could have been composed as early as A.D. 50, a small minority maintains. Its author was a Platonist who was committed to the gospel tradition, said one group of scholars earlier in this century. It was written by a diaspora Jew whose milieu was the Hellenist Judaism characteristic of those who followed the line of the martyred Stephen, more modern scholars claim,.
  • John was the document of a local church that had broken finally with the synagogue, we are assured. Alternatively, it comes from a Jewish believer in Jesus, one of a circle of the like-minded whose high Christology repelled equally other Jews who believed in Jesus and Jews of the synagogue.
We can see how frustrating it can be for those who are looking for a clear direction from John.  Is this gospel one man’s opinion or is it the legitimate testimony of a larger community?  Is the writer really quoting Jesus or simply saying things they wish he had said and done?  While Sloyan’s questions come more from the academic side, Marc Borg offers us a few specific points where John clearly differs from Matthew, Mark, and Luke:
  • John’s Jesus talks -- a lot.  His teachings come in the form of long, multi-page discourses, as opposed to the short, pithy parables that are Jesus’ primary teaching tools in the synoptics.
  • In the synoptics, Jesus is an exorcist, routinely expelling demons in the process of many of his healings.  In John there are no exorcisms – none.
  • In Matthew, Mark, and Luke, Jesus’ public ministry takes place in the northern area surrounding Galilee, heading south into Jerusalem only in the final week before his death.  In contrast, John’s Jesus moves back and forth between Jerusalem and the north several times.

There are
more differences to cite, but these are enough to make our point and get us started, because the point, after all, isn’t to just find differences but to recognize that that these differences in the gospel accounts do exist.  And since they exist, do they in any way alter our understanding of the whole Jesus story or are they simply the viewpoints of different communities and nothing more?

That’s why we’re heading into deeper study of this gospel.  We know the high spots – the Prologue, John 3:16 – now we need to read the rest of the story and find what this different gospel says to us about Jesus and our lives as followers of Christ.
 
0 Comments

JESUS IS THE WORDD OF GOD

7/7/2024

0 Comments

 
John1:1-5, 10 -14
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.  He was in the beginning with God.  All things came into being through him, and without him not one thing came into being.  What has come into being in him was life, and the life was the light of all people.  The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overtake it...


He was in the world, and the world came into being through him, yet the world did not know him.  He came to what was his own, and his own people did not accept him.  But to all who received him, who believed in his name, he gave power to become children of God, who were born, not of blood or of the will of the flesh or of the will of man, but of God.

And the Word became flesh and lived among us, and we have seen his glory, the glory as of a father’s only son, full of grace and truth.



Familiar reading, right?  Certainly one of the most beautiful

We had an interesting discussion last week at In-Person church after my message.  If you recall, the message had been about what the bible says and just how we today understand what we read and the difference between our understanding and how the original writer may have meant it.  Cultural differences, language differences, and two thousand years of history can make a vast difference in interpretation.

One of the most interesting points that came up in our discussion was the application of the phrase “Word of God.”  Most of us were raised up to refer to the Bible as “the Word of God,” but in that Bible, most particularly in John's Gospel, Jesus himself is called the Word of God.

The Gospel of John is one of the most interesting of the gospels – different in so many ways from the other three.  Our lectionary system is based on three cycles of year-long readings – one year for each of the three synoptic gospels – Matthew, Mark, and Luke.  This allows us to interact with each of these in some depth.  Unfortunately, that plan doesn’t provide a year to study John with the same attention.  And that is a shame, because this gospel certainly deserves our time and study.

When we’ve read from John’s writings in the past, we’ve discussed John’s Christology – his theological beliefs as to who and what Jesus was/is.  The three synoptics tended to see Jesus as a human – just like one of us – who is specially chosen by God and empowered to speak God’s word and do God’s will, whereas John, as we’ve mentioned recently believed that Jesus himself was, in some way, God’s Word, who before anything was, spoke all that is into existence.

We’ve discussed much of this in the past couple of months and I don’t really want to do it all again right now.  What I do want is to look back to last week and remember our conversation centered on the understanding that Jesus IS God’s Word.  When God spoke to God’s people, the language he chose to use was Jesus.  Not written letters strung together into sentences, but the actions, the loving, the caring, healing, teaching – the dying even, of Jesus said everything God wanted us to hear.  Jesus is he living, breathing, flesh and blood Word that God spoke to God’s creation.

So what does this mean to how we read scripture?  Are we aware as we read that it isn’t just the stories that make up the written story of Jesus’ life among us that constitute the Word of God.  It’s not letters printed on a page that quote God’s Word for us to read – It’s the heart and soul of Jesus that speak to us every word of love God wants us to hear.

Does this understanding change how we read scripture?  If we begin to really understand that Jesus, instead of being just the mouthpiece for the message, somehow, IS the message, does that change what we think we’ve always known of him?

In John’s writings Jesus makes  a series of “I am...” statements:
  • I am the light of the world...
  • I am the bread of life...
  • I am the gate...
  • I am the way...
  • I am the truth...
  • I am the resurrection and the life...

Taken all together – and if we take them seriously – this is a much larger, all-encompassing image of Jesus than just the long-haired, white robed human walking around Galilee teaching in parables that we know from all the stories.  Can we reconcile them?  Do they change what the written stories have always told us about this Jesus?

While we may understand it intellectually, can we truly comprehend what it means to say the Bread of Life speaks to us?  Do we understand the language of the Light of the World?


The synoptics give us comfortable stories of Jesus – John’s image is less comfortable and stretches our understanding.  Are we willing to do the work of reconciling the two Jesus’s we’ve been given into one?  Can we?

0 Comments
    Picture

    Rev. Cherie Marckx

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013

    RSS Feed